How to Share a 'No-Go Performance List' for Voiceover Requests: Question Templates and a Zero-Misalignment Briefing Flow

Narration from ¥50,000, delivered in as little as 24 hours.
* If you have a fixed budget, let me know and we can work from there.
In Voiceover Briefs, Share the “No-Go” List Before the “Ideal”
The most common failure in voiceover requests is the vague feedback: “This isn’t quite the image we had in mind.” In most cases, the client shared only the ideal tone, but never clarified what kind of delivery should be avoided.
In real projects, eliminating three no-go styles usually works better than presenting only one “good example.” From a practical directing standpoint, projects with a clear no-go performance list consistently achieve a much higher first-take approval rate. This is especially effective for corporate videos, recruitment films, web commercials, and e-learning content.
Why does this work? Because words like “bright,” “trustworthy,” or “premium” are too broad. Different people hear them differently. But phrases like “avoid teleshopping energy,” “no radio-DJ style,” or “don’t lift sentence endings too much” are much more concrete as audio criteria.
In other words, briefing accuracy improves more through subtraction than addition.
Question Templates to Uncover What the Client Dislikes
A strong hearing session does not begin with “What kind of voice do you want?” It begins with “What do you want to avoid?” Below is a practical template you can use as-is.
1. What kind of delivery would feel “too much” for this project?
Example: too cheerful, too emotional, too dramatic
2. If a past narration felt wrong, what exactly felt off?
Example: sentence endings sounded too light, too sales-like, too fast
3. Are there competitor or reference examples whose tone you want to avoid?
Two URLs are usually enough. YouTube, TV commercials, and corporate videos all work.
4. If you want “trustworthiness,” which of these would be unacceptable?
- too heavy
- too deep in tone
- too mechanical
- too authoritative
5. Do you have any tempo-related red flags?
Example: long pauses are not acceptable, explanation should feel like 1.1x speed, calm is good but slow is not
6. On a scale of 1 to 10, what is the maximum emotional intensity you can accept?
In practice, numbers like “up to 3/10” or “6 is acceptable” help teams align fast.
7. Are there any habits in endings or accents that you dislike?
Example: no rising endings, don’t overemphasize English loanwords, avoid an overly Tokyo-style sound for a Kansai audience
These seven questions prevent most misunderstandings. The key is not relying on open-ended answers alone. Mix free comments with options and numbers. The moment a vague feeling becomes measurable, it becomes easier for the whole production team to share.
How to Build a Practical “No-Go Performance List”
The best format is a one-page A4 document. If it gets too long, people stop reading it. These five categories are highly practical:
- Tone: too bright, too heavy, too theatrical, too mechanical
- Tempo: too fast, too slow, too flat, repetitive sentence endings
- Emotional level: too intense, forced empathy, overly moving/dramatic
- Commercial smell: teleshopping style, hype, DJ feel, sales pressure
- Brand mismatch: sounds too young, not premium enough, too stiff, not friendly enough
One highly effective addition is to include a short reason for each no-go item.
For example, “No teleshopping style” is still abstract. But “Because this is a medical service, a sales-driven tone may reduce trust” gives both the performer and the director a clear decision basis. A restriction only works when its background is shared too.
A Briefing Flow That Gets Close to Zero Misalignment
Here is a six-step workflow I recommend:
1. Share the script
A final script is ideal, but at minimum send the fixed version 24 hours before recording. Last-minute rewrites often cause performance drift.
2. Send one OK reference and two NG references
If you send only a positive example, interpretation remains too wide. Multiple no-go references narrow the target faster.
3. Attach the no-go performance list as a one-page file
Don’t scatter it across email text. A single Notion page or Google Doc reduces missed details.
4. Hold a 15-minute pre-recording alignment session
Zoom, Google Meet, or even a voice memo can work. This is where contradictory phrases like “bright but not light” should be broken down.
5. Confirm a 15–30 second test recording first
A short pre-check dramatically reduces the risk of re-recording everything. Depending on the project, this alone can cut revision workload by 30–50%.
6. Give revision notes as “differences,” not impressions
Instead of saying “make it better,” say:
- reduce tempo by 8%
- flatten sentence endings
- lower emotional intensity from 5 to 3
This is the golden rule.
The most important principle in this flow is not leaving abstract words untouched. Terms like “elegant,” “friendly,” and “sincere” are dangerous unless translated into audible behavior.
A Sample of an Effective Request
A real-world brief can be this simple:
> Objective: Recruitment video. We want to create trust for applicants in their late 20s to early 30s.
> OK direction: calm, clean, clear explanation.
> NG direction: teleshopping push, radio-DJ style, excessive emotion, rising sentence endings.
> Tempo: about 95 when 100 is standard.
> Emotional level: up to 3 on a 10-point scale.
> References: 1 OK sample, 2 NG samples attached.
> Please confirm the first 20 seconds before the full first take.
With this alone, a voice actor can match the target with much higher accuracy.
The best clients are not the ones who write the longest instructions. They are the ones who define the clearest criteria.
Conclusion: A Good Brief Doesn’t Restrict Talent, It Prevents Confusion
A no-go performance list is not meant to suppress creative freedom. It is meant to reduce unnecessary trial and error so the performer can use creativity in the right range.
In voiceover requests, it matters more to share what you dislike than to describe only what you like.
Define the no-go zone before searching for the ideal.
That is the most reliable way to achieve a briefing with virtually zero misalignment.

Masahiro Kobayashi
Professional Narrator
A Japanese male narrator handling over 200 projects a year across corporate videos, commercials and documentaries. Recorded in a broadcast-quality home studio and delivered fast.
Listen to voice samplesRelated Articles
Narration Booking Cancellations & Postponements: Fees, Etiquette, and Contract Wording
A practical guide to cancellation and postponement etiquette for narration bookings, covering industry norms, cost allocation, typical fee ranges from 0 to 100%, and contract wording.
The Complete Invoice & Quotation Template for Narration Fees: How to Separate Recording, Studio, Travel, and Retake Costs
A practical guide to standard quotation and invoice formats for narration projects, covering recording fees, studio, travel, retakes, invoice registration numbers, and standard payment terms.
How to Design Narrator Audition Reads Without Regret: Script Length, Direction Detail, and the Free-to-Paid Boundary
A practical guide for video production teams on designing narrator audition reads: ideal script length, content selection, direction detail, and where free test reads should end and paid work should begin.
CONTACT
Narration Enquiries & Quotes
Corporate VP, commercials, e-learning, product manuals — you do not need everything decided. Send the script length, intended media and target date, and I will come back with a proposal.
- From
- ¥50,000〜
- Turnaround
- 24 hours
- Format
- WAV / MP3
* If you have a fixed budget, let me know and we can work from there.
Or email directly: info@kobatee.jp